F.A.C.E. to FACE

 

F.A.C.E. BULLETIN

3/14/06

 

Dear Friends,

 Associated Press article, Bill compensates for kids losing vouchers-

Two programs are left after one ruled unconstitutional.  Also, some behind the scenes from that event.  If you are not nor have never been, you can and need to be involved in similar interactions with your state legislators.  Let us know if you are willing to help us, help you, help the legislators understand how the school choice scholarships help kids!   

 The New York Times article, Vouching For Good Education, that appeared in the Tampa Tribune.

  Thank you for Stepping Up For Students,

 Michael A. Benjamin

Executive Director, F.A.C.E.

Florida Alliance for Choices in Education


Bill compensates for kids losing vouchers

Two programs are left after one ruled unconstitutional

 BILL KACZOR

Associated Press

 

TALLAHASSEE - About 700 children in a voucher program that the Florida Supreme Court has declared unconstitutional could remain in private schools at taxpayer expense under a bill that cleared a House committee Friday.

 

The measure also would increase state regulation and accountability for private schools that take voucher students under two remaining state programs, including a requirement for fingerprinting and criminal background checks of teachers and other staff.

 

The Republican-dominated House Education Appropriations Committee approved the bill 16-4. The opponents, all Democrats, praised the accountability standards but objected to letting students receiving unconstitutional "opportunity scholarships" shift to another voucher program for poor children.

 

The vote came after Ronald Manuel, an air-conditioning worker from Orlando, told the committee that his son, Ronald Jr., 17, was an A and B student again after getting an opportunity voucher to attend South Orlando Christian Academy. He said his son, who did well in elementary school, had declined to a C, D and F student at a failing public high school.

 

"That scholarship allows my son to have a better chance of achieving a lot more than he would have if he was going in the direction he was going in," Manuel said.

 

The Opportunity Scholarship Program, a keystone of Gov. Jeb Bush's 1999 school accountability overhauls, provided vouchers to students from public schools graded F by the state for two years out of four.

The Supreme Court ruled the program violated a provision in the Florida Constitution that requires a uniform system of public schools and that it must cease at the end of the current school year. The justices found it created a separate system for voucher schools that are exempt from many rules and requirements that public schools must meet.

 

Accountability measures in the bill (HB 7041) sponsored by the committee's chairman, Rep. Joe Pickens, R-Palatka, are designed to reduce those differences for schools in the other two voucher programs.

A proposed constitutional amendment (HJR 1573) was introduced Tuesday to reverse the Supreme Court's decision and let the Legislature establish voucher programs for any purpose. The proposal, not yet scheduled for a committee hearing, would go on the Nov. 7 ballot if both legislative chambers approve it by a three-fifths vote.

The Supreme Court ruling did not affect the other voucher programs, but supporters are worried they may be challenged next. Together they affect about 30,000 students.

 

The McKay Scholarship Program is for disabled children, including those with learning disabilities, while poor children can obtain vouchers supported through corporate tax credits.

 

Pickens' bill would continue to exempt voucher schools from many requirements, including the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test, or FCAT, used to grade public schools.

 

Rep. Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall, D-Miami, cited the bill's lack of an FCAT requirement as another reason for her vote against the bill. Others Democrats voting against it were Ron Greenstein of Coconut Creek, Bruce Antone of Orlando and Charlie Justice of St. Petersburg.

"We wish there were two separate bills that we could stand alone so we can all hold hands and 'kumbaya' on the accountability," Greenstein said.

 

The only other Democrat on the committee, Rep. Shelley Vana of Lantana, voted for the bill.

 

© 2006 Bradenton Herald and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.bradenton.com

 

 

BEHIND THE SCENES

 

We arranged for Ronald Manuel, an African- American single Dad, from Orlando to travel to Tallahassee to testify at the House Education Appropriations Meeting this morning.  His son Ron, Jr. attended Jones High School and then Oak Ridge High School, both double F schools, before taking advantage of the Opportunity Scholarship Program.  He is now attending South Orlando Christian School, is in the 11th grade and is very pleased.

 

Ron, Jr. had been an A student in public elementary and middle school but fell to C/D student once he began at Jones and the situation did not improve when they moved to another part of Orlando only to discover Ron, Jr. had to attend another failing school- Oak Ridge

 

We prepared Mr. Manuel for some of the hostile questions he would probably get from the opponents. Rep. Vana took the lead on the questioning only to discover she had met her match.  On Class Size question he stated that was not important to him - what matter most was if son laws earning and doing his best. He stated he had not visited the classroom to see how many kids are in there. He meets with teachers after school .She asked if he had the choice to send his son to different a public school would he.  He said he actually only went looking at private schools as a last resort- he preferred to send his son to a public school but he could not find one that had the room to take his son- most campuses are over capacity- and that was convenient for him. She asked him what he thought was the real problem at Oak Ridge and Jones.  Mr. Manuel said they were disorganized and did not care what happened to his son.  He asked the assistant principal to direct him to the attendance office and the principal said he did not know were it was.  He asked for a parent conference and only 2 the teachers bothered to show up and told him his son was doing great.  The report card showed C's and D's.  She realized she was in over her head and stop.

 

He was upset Rep. Antone voted no as well as Bendross-Mindingall.  Rep. Antone even stated at meeting he supported scholarship programs and was pleased choice worked out well for his son.  Rep. Vana and Rep. Greenstein pulled Rep. Antone aside before the vote and it appeared pressured him to vote no.

 

When Chairman Pickens closed he said he did not have to close as Mr. Manuel had already done that for him and how could anybody not want Ron, Jr. to continue attending his private school but rather make him return to the failing school. 

 

We also caught the Associated Press TV cameraman attending the meeting and had him interview Ron after the meeting.

 

We took Mr. Manuel to see Rep. Bendross-Mingdingall and Rep. Antone after the meeting.  Rep. Bendross-Mingdingall said we have to help all the kids not just a few and Ron replied how can you expect my son to languish at the failing school while we wait to fix it- he could be 22 years old before that happens and then it is too late.  She asked him to stay in touch and keep setting a good example for other African -American men.

 

Rep. Antone's district is very near the private school and some of the parents live in his district.  Ron met with Rep. Antone for about 15 minutes.  Rep. Antone said he voted no because of the comments from members that if he voted no he was voting to send these kids back to failing schools.  Ron did not settle for that and continued to probe, shared his personal story, showed him his son's grades from Oak Ridge and South Orlando Christian, and would not back down. Rep. Antone said he realized these programs can work and promised to vote yes when it comes to the floor- gave Ron his card and asked him to stay in touch.

 

We went to see Rep. Vana but she had left already- Ron made an appointment to talk via phone with her next week.  It was a great afternoon and Ron is charged and ready to help in any way he can.

 


Vouching For Good Education

By JOHN TIERNEY The New York Times

Published: Mar 8, 2006

At first glance, the near north side of Milwaukee can be a bleak place. But if you want to see inner-city children getting a good education, it's the most beautiful spot in America.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel refers to one of the area's arteries as the Main Street of School Reform.

"We've seen what school choice can do," said Gregory Stanford, an editorial writer and a columnist at the paper. "It's impressive to go around to the voucher schools and see kids learning. Their parents are much more satisfied with these schools. And the fears that the public schools would be hurt have turned out to be wrong."

In fact, the students in public schools have benefited from the competition. Two studies by Harvard researchers have shown that as the voucher program expanded in Milwaukee, there was a marked improvement in test scores at the public schools most threatened by the program.

"Poor teachers used to shuffle from one school on to another in what we called the dance of the lemons," says Ken Johnson, the head of the school board. "But we couldn't let that continue once our students had the option to go somewhere else."

Some of the new voucher schools have flopped - but the advantage of a voucher program is that a bad private school can be shut down a lot faster than a bad public school.

"All the good research, including the voucher opponents' work, shows that kids who accept vouchers are doing at least as well as their public school peers," says Joseph Viteritti of Hunter College. "That's remarkable, considering how much less money is being spent on the voucher students."

In Milwaukee, where the public system spends more than $10,000 per student, private schools get less than $6,400 for each voucher student. But when you see what can be done for that money, you realize what's wrong with Democrats' favorite solution for education: more money for the public school monopoly.

At the CEO Leadership Academy, a high school with 125 students in the new wing of a Baptist church, you find students who compare the school to a family. "When I first heard about this school, they told me the school day's longer and you have to wear a uniform," said Elliott Barnes, a ninth-grader. "I didn't like that at all. But then I walked in here and noticed right away how many people were smiling in the hall. In my public school, when a stranger smiled at you there, you started worrying."

The school principal, Denise Pitchford, worked in the public schools, but she took a pay cut in exchange for less red tape. "I wanted the flexibility to give immediate personal attention to every student," she said. "To me, it represented less money but a better opportunity." Just like the whole voucher program.


 

 

Florida Alliance for Choices in Education (F.A.C.E)

If you no longer want to receive this mailing or you wish to unsubscribe from
F.A.C.E mailings, please send an e-mail with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line to mbenjamin@flace.org.