F.A.C.E. to FACE

 

F.A.C.E. BULLETIN

6/16/05

 

Dear Friends,

 

The day of the Opportunity March was a truly historic day as the Florida Supreme Court heard the Opportunity Scholarship case. Over 2,000 people came to Tallahassee to march and rally on the Florida Supreme Court, from as far away as Miami. It was an exceedingly moving sight to see everyone marching up the Madison Street to the Supreme Court. Dr. Howard Fuller, Chairman of Black Alliance For Educational Options (BAEO), was a powerful leader of the March, reminding the parents and children how important their struggle is.  Virginia Walden Ford and former Senate President John McKay (founder of the McKay Scholarships), also represented magnificently. As did the President and CEO of the Florida Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Julio Fuentes and Edwin Rodriguez, Chairman of the Florida Black Chambers of Commerce, who publicly committed their organizations to school choice.

 

There are references in every major newspaper regarding parents and children coming from their local community to Tallahassee. It seems that every story has a reference to the March/Rally and its size. This is a significant departure from past reporting, when the press ignored the human side of the story. We are told that TV coverage was extensive, with many local shots of people boarding buses.

 

Please view the following segment.  We could not have asked for a better visual and the lawyer for the union is drowned out by the parents. Once in the site, click on the voucher story:

 

http://www.wtsp.com/news/news.aspx?storyid=14689

 

We want to thank all of you who participated in the Opportunty March.  We know the logistical challenges of bringing people to the state capitol in the summer, when school is out, vacations are planned and you have to leave earlier in the morning.  You truly are Spartans.

 

 

Thank you for Stepping Up For Students,

 

Michael A. Benjamin

Executive Director, F.A.C.E.

Florida Alliance for Choices in Education


* THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES APPEARED IN VARIOUS PAPERS EITHER THE DAY OF OR AFTER THE OPPORTUNITY MARCH IN TALLAHASSEE *


 

We have a date for the 2006 March/Rally.  It is February 23rd.

 

The event will be during legislative session; therefore we will unequivocally be including legislative visits that day.  Never too soon to start planning…


Thousands vouch for system
Florida Supreme Court justices hear arguments on school program

Tallahassee
DEMOCRAT CAPITOL BUREAU CHIEF

One lawyer calls school choice the "civil rights issue of the 21st century," and the rally of some 2,000 people outside the Florida Supreme Court on Tuesday bore many similarities to those rallies of the past.

There was chanting and clapping and impassioned speeches. Uniformed police ringed the perimeter, and several guarded the courthouse doors. Inside, Supreme Court justices in a packed courtroom listened to an hour of arguments on whether the state's voucher program violates the state constitution.

The case is being watched nationwide because Florida is the only state with a statewide voucher program. While the ruling won't set precedent for other states, it could very well provide the impetus for them to increase or decrease their use of vouchers, attorneys said.

Opponents say using taxpayer money to send children to private schools not only violates constitutional separation of church and state, but also guts the constitution's requirement that the state provide free, uniform, high-quality education of children through a public-school system.

John West, an attorney representing families in the public-school system, said the framers of the Florida Constitution recognized the importance to society of children from all walks of life learning together, rather than being taught separately.

"The free public-school system ... is the cornerstone of our civilization upon which the very future of our form of government may well depend," he said.

Proponents say Gov. Jeb Bush's 1999 A-Plus program offers children a chance to get out of a failing school and has improved the public school system by providing competition. They note that in 1999, the state had 78 schools graded "F" under the Bush program. Now there are just 14.

"At the end of the day, school choice is the civil rights issue of the 21st century," said Clark Neily, attorney for the families currently using vouchers. "There's no other single issue in the country that truly divides the haves and the have-nots about who gets to choose their child's education and who's stuck with what they're given."

The Supreme Court got the case after a circuit court and then the 1st District Court of Appeal found the law unconstitutional.

As is typical, high-court justices peppered attorneys on both sides with questions, leaving lawyers little chance to use their prepared arguments. The court, as is its policy, didn't make an immediate ruling but will release a written ruling sometime in the future.

Chief Justice Barbara Pariente asked voucher proponents where the Legislature gets the authority to "have other forms of education, other than the public education that is provided for in (the constitution)."

"So when you read Article IX Section 1, doesn't that give, isn't that an expression of the way that the Legislature is to, in fact, educate the children of this state? That is through a system of free public education," Pariente said.

Justices grilled both sides fairly evenly, but both sides left the hearing optimistic.

Students have been allowed to keep using vouchers while the case wends its way through the legal system. Of some 2.5 million K-12 students in Florida, 719 are using tax-backed Opportunity Scholarships, with 58 percent of them going to religious schools. Combined, the state's three voucher programs have about 25,000 students. In addition, many of the estimated 90,000 to 150,000 students are eligible for the new voluntary pre-kindergarten program will also attend on vouchers.

Voucher opponents include the Florida Congress of Parents and Teachers (Florida PTA), the League of Women Voters of Florida, the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, the Florida Education Association, People for the American Way and the Florida Chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

Supporters include Gov. Jeb Bush, Attorney General Charlie Crist, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Florida Catholic Conference and a coalition made up of the Black Alliance for Educational Options, Hispanic Council for Reform and Educational Options, Florida State Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, McKay Coalition and the Florida African American Education Alliance.

The 2,000 supporters - many with children in tow - formed a sea of red T-shirts as those who were early enough to get a seat inside the courtroom exited the building. The matching shirts bore the universal symbol for "warning" and the words "200,000 scholarships at risk" on the back.

The crowd was organized from around the state and came to Tallahassee on 50 buses.

"We're here to say," said Howard Fuller, chairman do the Black Alliance for Educational Options, "that it's un-American for only those with money to choose their education."


MORE ABOUT VOUCHERS

Types of taxpayer-backed education vouchers in use in Florida:

Opportunity Scholarships: A key component of Gov. Jeb Bush's 1999 A-Plus Plan, these are given to parents of children who attend schools that have been graded F twice in the past four years, based on Florida Comprehensive Assessment Tests. This is the voucher being challenged.

McKay Scholarships: Vouchers given to parents of children with learning disabilities. They are named for former Senate President John McKay, who championed the measure.

Corporate Scholarships: Corporations get tax breaks for giving money so that children of low-income families can attend private schools.


Jun 8, 2005

2,000 Rally In Support Of Vouchers

By GARRETT THEROLF, Tampa Tribune
gtherolf@tampatrib.com


TALLAHASSEE - Just outside the Florida Supreme Court's heavy metal doors, an estimated 2,000 chanting parents and students made their case for school vouchers in the court of public opinion.

Inside, attorneys debated the constitutionality of giving public money to private schools.

``The court will make its decision on the legal arguments and so forth, but I think it's important that the people let the policy-makers and everyone else know this is important,'' said Howard Fuller, a former superintendent of Milwaukee public schools who has become a national spokesman for the voucher movement.

Fuller and the other protesters acknowledged they are trying to get ahead of the fallout from the court's decision, whatever it may be.

For that reason, and because vouchers exist only in a handful of states, a consortium of national organizations funded 38 buses to gather protesters from across the state and outfit them with matching red T-shirts proclaiming ``200,000 Futures at Risk.''

A spokeswoman for the demonstration, Kim Collins, declined to say which national organizations funded the operation and with how much money, but she said the organizations that carried it out included the Black Alliance for Education Options and the Florida State Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

Parents said they were coached to speak about ``parents' choice'' and the point that ``this is not a debate about public versus private, it's about how best to teach our kids.''

They dramatically outnumbered voucher opponents, who included public school teachers and Floridians who say vouchers erode the strength of public schools.

Speaking for the opponents on the street was one of their lead attorneys, Ron Meyer, who kept his comments mostly to the legal points, focusing on state constitutional requirements.

Public money to private schools, Meyer said, is ``not only unconstitutional, it's bad policy, and we think we already know that very well.''

Melvin Coleman, of Tampa, whose son Jordan attends Tampa Baptist Academy with state voucher money, said, ``My son wasn't learning anything in public school. For that reason, the people you see here will continue pushing for alternatives to public schools regardless of what happens with this particular case.''

Reporter Jerome R. Stockfisch contributed to this report. Reporter Garrett Therolf can be reached at (850) 222-8382.


School vouchers on line as justices tackle issue

BY JAMES DEAN
FLORIDA TODAY

Carrie Garrison isn't putting her son Tyler back in public schools, even if Florida's Supreme Court justices decide the state can't continue to pay his tuition at a Catholic school.

When the court begins hearing arguments today about the constitutionality of Gov. Jeb Bush's school voucher program, parents of more than 600 Brevard County students that use vouchers -- and the schools they attend -- will be watching closely.

"I think any parent should have a choice of whether to put their child in private or public school," said Garrison, 36, of Palm Bay. "It's not just about religion, it's about their education and where they're going to do better."

The case specifically concerns Opportunity Scholarships, for which no Brevard students are eligible. That's because no local schools have earned F grades twice in the last four years.

But a ruling against Opportunity Scholarships likely would affect other vouchers, like the McKay Scholarship for disabled students that Garrison last year used to enroll her son in second grade at St. Joseph's Catholic School.

It could also affect the state's new voluntary prekindergarten program and Bright Futures scholarships.

Garrison credits St. Joseph's with helping Tyler, who suffers from Auditory Processing Disorder, catch up to grade level after he'd been lagging in a public school. She's determined keep him there whether the voucher is available or not.

For some parents, however, losing the voucher would mean a return to public schools, which might be strained to create classroom space and hire qualified teachers.

Meanwhile, jobs could be threatened at some private schools, like R. F. M. Christian Academy in Melbourne, which depends on McKay Scholarships for about half of its 120 students.

"A lot of children will suffer because of the fact that public schools are overpopulated anyway," said Ezella Parker, the principal.

Enrico Pucci, principal at Park Avenue Christian Academy in Titusville, expects the legal fight to continue, whatever the state Supreme Court decides.

"It puts us and legislators on notice that we want to begin the process of legislating a little more clearly and efficiently how choice programs in Florida will work," he said.

Contact Dean at 242-3617 or jdean@flatoday.net


Voucher case may affect thousands

BY AARON DESLATTE
FLORIDA TODAY

TALLAHASSEE - Brenda McShane never asked to be a test subject in the cultural and legal clash surrounding school vouchers in Florida.

McShane was one of the first wave of parents in Pensacola to benefit from Gov. Jeb Bush's "Opportunity Scholarships," the nation's first statewide voucher program that lets children opt out of failing public schools.

It was a chance the mother of four considers a blessing from God, but one that groups from the National Education Association to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People call a cancer sucking the lifeblood of public schools.

Today, the six-year-old legal fight concerning Florida's landmark voucher program lands before the state Supreme Court, and no matter how the legal pendulum swings, some parents will be on the losing end. A decision after today's oral arguments could be months away.

Usually by 7 each morning, McShane drops off her 12-year-old daughter, Brenisha, at the Montessori School of Pensacola, a private, exclusive setting where her tuition, field trips and after-school care are paid for by the state.

"People should look at the big picture and forget about the separation of church and state. This is about educating children," said McShane, 48, a Head Start supervisor who will attend today's Supreme Court arguments with other voucher parents.

On the other side of the courtroom will be Susan Watson, a Pensacola mother whose children are plaintiffs in the suit. Watson came to Tallahassee on Monday with her two teenage children, Seth and Sybil, to argue public schools have done an excellent job.

"Public schools are free and open to all children, they are accountable to parents and taxpayers alike, and they are essential to our democracy," Watson said.

Education groups have charged the vouchers violate a 120-year constitutional provision that blocks using state funds "in aid of any church, sect, or religious denomination or in aid of any sectarian institution." Since Escambia County teacher Ruth Holmes first filed suit in 1999, lower courts largely have agreed.

Holmes, a Navarre Beach resident who now is retired, said Monday she remained convinced the threat of vouchers doesn't help public schools improve.

"I think teachers work just as hard today as before Jeb Bush ever mentioned the word 'vouchers,'" Holmes said.

Recent research on Florida's voucher program suggests it might. Harvard University professor Paul Peterson presented a study in March of individual student scores on Florida's state assessments that found schools on the verge of being declared "failing," thereby qualifying its students for vouchers, had shown improvements.


Groups ready to rally in capital

State Supreme Court to hear lawsuit today

By JENNIFER BOOTH REED Ft. Meyers News Press
JREED@NEWS-PRESS.COM

Auriel Williams bent over a poster-sized sheet of white paper, and in her best handwriting printed "Educational Freedom is a Civil Right."

The
Mount Hermon Christian School seventh-grader was getting ready Monday for today's rally in Tallahassee urging the state's highest court to preserve the school vouchers that make it possible for her and her younger brother to attend the private school. A total of 27 current and former Mount Hermon students will attend the rally.

The Florida Supreme Court today begins hearing oral arguments in a six-year-old lawsuit over school vouchers. Vouchers are state scholarships that families can use in certain instances to send their children to private schools.

At issue is whether taxpayer money can be used to pay tuition at faith-based schools such as Mount Hermon.

Justin Perry, 13, didn't receive a voucher to attend Mount Hermon, but thinks it's important to make private schools available for all students.

"It's important to me. It'll help me in the future and I know it'll help a lot of kids in the future," he said of his private school education.

Ten
Mount Hermon students receive vouchers now, but administrators expect that number will grow as Lee families become more aware of their availability.

The vouchers that Lee students can tap into are not the ones being challenged in the Supreme Court. The vouchers cited in the lawsuit are the "Opportunity Scholarships" the state offers to students whose public school earned F's twice in a four-year period. Lee has no F-rated schools.

Instead, Lee families can participate in voucher programs that serve low-income or disabled students.

But some observers say if the court finds Opportunity Scholarships unconstitutional, the Florida Pride Scholarships for lower-income families and the McKay Scholarships for students with disabilities will be challenged next. They also fear the Bright Futures Scholarships for college students and the universal prekindergarten amendment will be in jeopardy. Both allow students to apply state money to faith-based programs.

"All of those programs are on the chopping block if this one goes down," said Clark Neily, a senior attorney for the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Justice, which is fighting to preserve the Opportunity Scholarships. "The implications are huge."

The last court to rule on the case, the First District Court of Appeals, found the vouchers unconstitutional.

In Lee, relatively few students — 492 — have a McKay or Florida Pride Scholarship. The number of parents using pre-kindergarten money to send their children to a faith-based preschool won't be known until later this summer.

Local private school directors are watching the case. The Department of Education lists 15 faith-based private schools

in Lee eligible to receive McKay Scholarships and 23 that will accept the Florida Pride Scholarships. Some of them can receive both.

Some local schools, such as the
Father Anglim Academy at Dreams are Free, exist almost entirely because of state voucher money. Eighty percent of the academy's 65 students receive a state voucher. The school serves students with special needs.

A typical academy student gets $5,000 to $7,500 from the state, and the school frequently offers financial aid to those who can't pay the remaining tuition, $12,000 per year.

"If you cut out that amount of money, that's another car payment, that's another mortgage," Principal Lori Moreau said.

Moreau, a former public school teacher, once opposed vouchers and the idea of putting special-needs students in separate schools. Her experience at the academy changed her mind on both issues.

"I firmly believe in public schools and their place in our system, and I would be opposed to any voucher program that would threaten the stability of the system," she said.

She thinks her program is an alternative, not a competitor. She said some students with disability fare better at the academy because of the small, intimate setting and the school's practice of grouping together children with similar disabilities. That allows teachers to concentrate on specific needs, she said.

The academy, housed in a former convent, is part of the Diocese of Venice but gets no money from the area's Catholic headquarters. Students must take a daily religious class, but Moreau said the emphasis is on values, ethics and religious tolerance — not Catholic indoctrination.

Vicki Burnett transferred her son from public school to the academy three years ago.

"He's really come a long way with their help," said Burnett, whose son has dyslexia.

She doesn't think she could pay for tuition without the McKay scholarship.

Opponents of vouchers not only dislike the idea of taxpayer money going to religious organizations, they don't think the private schools can prove they're doing a better job.

Mark Pudlow, a spokesman for the Florida Education Association, said the state ought to pump money into smaller class sizes and more teacher training, which he said were proven methods of boosting student achievement.

"Why don't we fix the problems instead of farming them off?" he said.

Lee County School Board member Jane Kuckel said parents have enough choices with the district's focus on offering special programs and with charter schools, which must take the same standardized tests and are held to the same standards as traditional public schools.

"I don't see a need for vouchers at this time. I think we have plenty of opportunities for choice," Kuckel said. "Secondly, I support the separation of church and state. I am not in favor of offering money to schools that teach religion."


EDUCATION
School voucher case in court's hands
The Florida Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today on whether the state should be using public money to help students attend religious schools -- a case that's drawing national attention.
BY MARC CAPUTO and GARY FINEOUT
mcaputo@herald.com

TALLAHASSEE - A cornerstone of Gov. Jeb Bush's education legacy that has blurred some lines between church and state heads to oral arguments today at the Florida Supreme Court in a nationally watched case concerning God, the papacy and the Founding Fathers.

Central to the case: 39 words written 120 years ago into Florida's Constitution that basically ban spending money ''directly or indirectly in aid of'' religious institutions.

Bush's education system has allowed thousands of children to use tens of millions of public-money scholarships to attend private -- mostly religious -- schools since 1999, just after Bush campaigned for his classroom reforms and assumed office.

But before the first checks were written, largely to Roman Catholic schools, the state teachers' union and a coalition of other groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, sued on two constitutional counts: the so-called ''no-aid'' church-and-state provision and another that requires the state to run a ``high-quality system of free public schools.''

With Bush repeatedly appealing, the union and its allies have won at every court level on its no-aid claim, but has a mixed record on the free public-schools issue. Meantime, Bush and the Legislature have expanded the number and types of scholarships, known commonly as vouchers.

If Bush loses before Florida's high court, he might head to the U.S. Supreme Court to determine the extent to which church and state can mix. The case has drawn dozens of political special-interest groups from around the country to intervene. The state justices won't decide the case today, but will hear arguments for about an hour.

GOVERNOR'S OPTION

''I don't know what the [state] Supreme Court will do,'' said Bush, who shied away from speculating on whether he would take the case to the nation's top court should he lose once again. ``We're hopeful they will protect the rights of parents to make choices.''

The governor, quoting a dissenting appeals court judge, predicts in court filings ''catastrophic and absurd'' consequences if the court sides with the union: Cash-strapped parents will lose the right to choose schools for their kids, religious schools will be discriminated against unfairly, and other religious-based aid organizations -- from Baptist hospitals providing services to the poor, to religious colleges that accept students on public scholarships, to religious-based schools participating in the state's new voluntary prekindergarten program -- will face the ax.

`FEAR-MONGERING'

The union's lawyer, Ron Meyer, says Bush is ``fear-mongering with this parade of horribles.''

Meyer said Bush is ignoring one essential fact: ``The hospitals they're talking about don't promote religion. These religious schools teach religion. They inculcate religion. They promote religion. That's why they're religious schools.''

The union's court filings are replete with testimony from the principal of Pensacola's St. Michael Interparochial School, which received a third of the first scholarships in 1999, where teachers ''provide a Christ-centered and gospel-based education'' that forms the basis for ``why we exist.''

Bush has argued in court papers that the benefit to any religion is ``incidental.''

About 75 percent of the 1,200 schools that accept vouchers are religious schools, which accept nearly 90 percent of the money. All told, more than 26,000 children in Florida received one of three types of vouchers last year.

Since 1999, the state has spent about $260 million on vouchers for kids in failing schools and for disabled children.

The lawsuit specifically targets the failing-schools voucher program but would likely affect the one for the disabled, which was created in 2000 and is 20 times larger and 32 times more expensive than its predecessor.

NO-AID PROVISION

The third type of voucher, for poor kids, might not be affected if the court rules the vouchers violate the Constitution's no-aid provision. These are underwritten by corporations that get a tax write-off in return, so technically no money is spent from the state treasury.

However, the state's Pre-K program that could enroll upwards of 170,000 children would likely be affected by a ruling against the voucher program because many of the school providers are religious.

Bush has trumpeted the voucher programs, which passed along with the high-stakes Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test, for bringing ''rising student achievement,'' a claim backed up by a recent Harvard University study that found poorly performing schools do better when faced with the ''threat'' of losing students and being branded as failing.

Black and Hispanic students have received a disproportionate number of the vouchers in question and would be most hurt by a ruling against vouchers, said Bishop Harold Ray, a pastor at West Palm Beach-based Redemptive Life Fellowship and its affiliated school. Standing on the Supreme Court's steps during a January press conference, he called this a ''civil rights'' case.

Rather than discuss the potential civil-rights aspect of the case, Bush has attacked the foundation of the no-aid provision as rooted in ``anti-Catholic bigotry.''

The language was first inserted into Florida's Constitution in 1885, a few years after James Blaine of Maine -- a one-time Speaker of the House and Republican candidate for president -- sought to include the no-aid language into the U.S. Constitution.

Italian immigration was starting to increase at the time and Anglo-Saxon Protestants sought various means to control the new arrivals, including blocking Catholic schools from getting public money.

A host of states subsequently adopted the language.

But Meyer points out that notions regarding the separation of church and state preceded the so-called Blaine amendments, and go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, Benjamin Rush and Noah Webster.

Plus, the provision remained in Florida's Constitution as it was rewritten in the '60s, with some authors of that document saying it was kept specifically to prohibit vouchers.

So far, the governor hasn't received much help from judges. The nine-member First District Court of Appeal has twice shot down the voucher program.

But while Bush has suffered at the hands of the court, there's one area he has mastered: political campaigns. Some of his supporters and like-minded Christian conservatives have argued that the best way to deal with the no-aid provision is to pluck it out of the constitution.

POLITICAL DIVIDENDS

The political dividends of such a campaign against ''anti-Catholic bigotry'' and in support of ''school choice'' and minority education could be rich: involving Catholics, an active Republican-leaning voting bloc, as well as religious blacks and Hispanics, who tend to be Democrats.

But Bush has repeatedly shied away from proposing a constitutional initiative campaign. ''I'm keeping my powder dry,'' he says.


Bush's clever scheme still is unconstitutional 'indirect' aid to sectarian institutions

Sunday, June 05, 2005

Ever since Jeb Bush became governor of Florida, he has championed programs that undermine the state's public school system by transferring tax money from public to private and church-run schools.

The Governor's Opportunity Scholarship Program (aka vouchers) was sold to the public as a way to help children trapped in "failing" schools, despite the Florida Constitution's clear language barring aid to religious institutions. Relying on this clever strategy, Gov. Bush and supporters of taxpayer financing of religious schools now have created four voucher programs, three of which have little to do with "failing" schools.

And now, finally, the showdown at the Florida Supreme Court: It is one of the most important cases in the state's history. It certainly will be crucial for Florida families who rely on the neighborhood public school for the formal education of their children.

For 137 years, the following words have appeared in the Florida Constitution: "No revenue of the state shall ever be taken from the public treasury directly or indirectly in aid of any sectarian institution." Three courts have reviewed the governor's voucher program. Based on this principle, all have declared it unconstitutional.

Because the Constitution is so clear, the voucher program is being defended by scare tactics and by calling defenders of public schools enemies of education reform.

n The first tactic is to spread fear that if aid to church-run schools is not permitted, then the work of religious charities (e.g., Lutheran refugee resettlement programs, Catholic adoption agencies, Jewish Vocational Services, etc.) are also vulnerable to legal challenge.

This nation has been dependent on the wonderful work of religious charities since the birth of the Republic. But when religiously affiliated charities choose to contract with the government to deliver social services, they commit to serving the needs of the community without proselytizing and without regard to the religious affiliation of who is served and who is hired to serve. They are free to do otherwise, but then they must rely on the donations of parishioners, not contracts with government.

n A second scare tactic warns that if the court upholds the constitutional tradition of no aid to religious institutions, the education of hundreds of children will be disrupted. But this rewards the governor's exploitation of the prolonged legal process in order to create "new facts." He has pressed forward with a scheme that was unconstitutional at its inception — and now yells foul that he might be thwarted.

Claiming that defenders of public schools are enemies of education reform is just silly in light of the experimentation taking place throughout the country. There are magnet schools, charter schools and schools within schools. There are also reforms that could and should be adopted, such as parental choice to send children to any public school within a district and reorganizing "failing" schools. All these offer choices and increased opportunities for the involvement of parents in the education of their children.

Of course, the most effective reform involves putting kids in smaller classes that allow for more individualized attention. Research documents that this leads to higher achievement, especially in the early years, and particularly for poor and minority students. But Gov. Bush has resisted this reform and, even after adoption by the voters, has worked to undermine it.

Vouchers for church-run schools are part of a political and ideological crusade, not a plan for education reform. True education reform would not include programs aimed at facilitating the abandonment of the public schools. Nor would true reforms exhibit such blind faith in the private sector as does Florida's voucher program — one that does not require certified teachers, that permits vouchers to be used at schools having no track record and exempts students attending private and church-run schools from state testing.

Private and parochial schools have made great contributions to America. But neighborhood public schools have been an engine of opportunity and a vehicle for advancement for generations of Americans, especially the poor and middle class.

Forget vouchers. Work for the improvement of neighborhood public schools. The children of Florida and our democracy depend upon that.

Howard L. Simon is executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida. The ACLU is co-counsel in Bush vs. Holmes, the lawsuit challenging the voucher program.


State's high court hears arguments on vouchers

BY GARY FINEOUT, Miami Herald
gfineout@herald.com

TALLAHASSEE - A clearly skeptical Florida Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday morning on whether or not it should throw out the nation's first statewide voucher program, a cornerstone of education reforms pushed into law six years ago by Gov. Jeb Bush.

A coalition of groups, including the state's teacher union, as well as civil rights groups such as the NAACP, first filed a lawsuit against the program back in 1999 and it is just now reaching the state's highest court.

Both sides expected to spend most of the hour-long session debating whether using vouchers to send children to a religious school violates a provision in the state constitution that bars aid to any church or religious institution. Instead, justices spent most of their time on whether paying to send children to private schools violates the state constitution's requirement of a system of ``free public schools.''

'''Wouldn't you agree that it appears to be the intent of the drafters...that any money appropriated for schools...can only go to the system of free public schools?'' Justice Harry Lee Anstead asked lawyers representing Bush.

If the court were to rule against vouchers, it would be a substantial setback for Bush, who campaigned in 1998 promising to use vouchers as a catalyst to improve Florida's public education system.

In 1999, Bush pushed through the Florida Legislature his A+ program that offers financial rewards to high-performing schools and sanctions poor performing ones. Included in that legislation was the opportunity scholarship program, which offers vouchers to students who attend a school that receives a failing grade twice during a four year period.

While it was the first program authorized by lawmakers, the opportunity scholarship program remains the smallest with only about 700 students receiving vouchers statewide. Instead thousands of children receive vouchers through two other programs created since 1999.

The court took testimony at the same time that roughly 2,000 parents and children descended on the steps of the Capitol for a rally to show their support for keeping intact the state's three school choice programs.

Clad in red and yellow shirts that read ''Warning'' on the front and ''200,000 Futures at Risk,'' the crowd of mainly Hispanic and black parents and children chanted and applauded speakers who vowed to keep the voucher programs alive even if the court eventually ruled against them.

Among those in attendance was Camille Merilus, whose two sons attend a private school in Miami courtesy of one of the three voucher programs.

''It gives me peace of mind,'' said Merilus, who is blind. ``I don't have to worry about them getting involved in drugs and other forms of criminal activity.''


State high court has tough questions about vouchers

Justices hear debate on Opportunity Scholarships, with the fate of other voucher programs riding on the court's decision.

By RON MATUS, Times Staff Writer
Published
June 8, 2005


TALLAHASSEE - The Florida Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday over the constitutionality of the state's first school voucher program in a case fraught with race, religion and potential impact on other state programs.

While busloads of children gathered outside, lawyers tangled for 70 minutes over the legality of Opportunity Scholarships, the program signed into law by Gov. Jeb Bush in 1999 that allows students in failing public schools to attend private schools at state expense.

Opponents, led by the state's teachers union, say vouchers illegally drain money from public schools and channel state money to religious institutions.

The language chosen by the framers of Florida's Constitution "reflects the recognition of the important value to society of the common school ... where children from all walks of life learn together," said John West, lead attorney for the plaintiffs.

The state argued that vouchers are driven by a nonreligious purpose: to throw a lifeline to children in the worst schools and to improve those schools through competition.

If religion benefits, it's incidental, supporters say.

"The Opportunity Scholarship program is in aid of Florida's children, period," said Florida Solicitor General Christopher Kise, one of three lawyers who argued the case for the state.

Justices interrupted the lawyers early and often, posing sharp questions about the two sections of the state Constitution at issue.

"Hot bench," said Steve Gey, a Florida State University constitutional law professor who attended the hearing.

The justices appeared to be more skeptical about vouchers than he had expected, Gey said. And they surprisingly focused little attention on the church-state question - a big issue nationally - and more on constitutional language mandating a "system of free public schools."

"They really didn't let go of it," Gey said.

About 700 students participate in the voucher program, most of them black or Hispanic. But the court decision could ripple far beyond them.

The Opportunity Scholarship program is the first and only statewide voucher program in the country and a key plank in Bush's education revamp. Voucher supporters, including religious groups and conservative think tanks, have rallied to its defense, while a long line of liberal groups including the NAACP and American Civil Liberties Union have fought to kill it.

Supporters say if the court rules against Opportunity Scholarships, other state programs will fall because they, too, channel state money to institutions with religious ties.

Among them: the state's two other voucher programs, including McKay scholarships for students with disabilities; the new prekindergarten program, which leans heavily on religious providers; Medicaid funding to hospitals with religious affiliations; and probation and rehabilitation programs run by the Salvation Army.

Many of the children attending Tuesday's rally received vouchers through the other programs. Altogether, more than 28,000 students use vouchers.

"Hopefully they aren't collateral damage," said former state Senate President John McKay, who attended the hearing and for whom McKay vouchers are named.

Many of the 1,500 people attending the rally, organized by a host of minority groups, were black or Hispanic. Polls have shown strong support for vouchers among minorities.

"Opportunity. That's why I'm here," said Lucille Stromas, 69, a black Pensacola resident whose grandchild received a voucher.

Because seating in the courtroom was limited to 100 people, voucher supporters began lining up at 6 a.m. for the 9 a.m. hearing. The first 30 were black.

After a late-night trip, Stromas got up at 4 a.m. to make sure she got a seat.

As the hearing proceeded, voucher supporters flooded the street and plaza between the front steps of the Supreme Court building and the state Capitol. Many had traveled overnight in buses to take part in a highly choreographed ceremony, complete with matching red T-shirts and protest signs that sagged in the sticky Tallahassee heat.

"What do we want? School choice! When do we want it? Now!" the crowd roared.

Inside, the debate was more subdued, but lively by Supreme Court standards.

Justice Harry Lee Anstead asked whether Opportunity Scholarships could open the door to a universal voucher system in which parents could get state money to send their children to the private school of their choice.

Kise, the solicitor general, said no.

"That may raise other constitutional questions," he said, without elaborating.

But given a similar question later, Barry Richard, the state's lead attorney, wouldn't shut the door.

It's up to the Legislature to determine how much money it allocates to public education, he said, and there is nothing in the Constitution to prevent it from giving money to private schools.

"So wait," said Chief Justice Barbara Pariente. If the Legislature spent 90 percent of the state education budget on private schools, that would be okay?

"Yes your honor," Richard said.

Pariente followed by citing Brown vs. Board of Education , the seminal 1954 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that ended segregated schools.

If Richard's interpretation had been in vogue after Brown , she said, "we would have had all of the white students in a system of private schools and left the public schools for the minorities."

Richard said that brings up an equal protection issue, which he was not prepared to answer.

But "you touch on the quintessential point," he said. "Percentages are a decision for the Legislature."

The justices didn't ignore the church-state question.

The state Constitution prohibits state money from being used "in aid of" religion. But whether the line is clearly drawn is also key to the debate.

More than half of the Opportunity Scholarship recipients are enrolled in religious schools.

West, the plaintiffs' attorney, said many of the schools "have, as a major part of their program, religious training and instruction."

His argument drew a series of questions from Justice Raoul Cantero.

"You would argue that funds cannot be used to send Johnny to St. Mary's school, regardless of whether St. Mary's even had a religion class?" he asked.

No, West said.

The critical question isn't whether the school is church affiliated but "what the funds are going for."

One legal observer said the court's focus on the school-funding question could mean it is looking for the least controversial grounds on which to find the voucher program unconstitutional.

"The court operates in the real world," said Tim McLendon, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Florida. "To hold the voucher program unconstitutional is going to some extent not be well received by the other branches of state government."

A ruling on nonreligious grounds might be "less of a red flag," he said.

A decision is expected in the coming months.

--Times staff writer Joni James contributed to this report. Ron Matus can be reached at 727 893-8873 or matus@sptimes.com

[Last modified June 8, 2005, 01:08:09]


FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
Court hears voucher arguments
Skeptical Florida Supreme Court justices questioned lawyers for the state about whether Florida's school voucher program is constitutional.

gfineout@herald.com

A majority of the Florida Supreme Court expressed misgivings and skepticism Tuesday about whether the nation's first statewide private school voucher program is legal.

While justices did not say how long it will take for them to rule, it was clear the hourlong proceedings before the seven-member court could be the prelude to the end of the voucher program -- a centerpiece of Gov. Jeb Bush's A+ education plan pushed into law in 1999.

A ruling striking down the program could have far-reaching ramifications and could doom other state programs, including one offering vouchers to disabled children and Florida's universal prekindergarten program scheduled to start this fall.

A coalition of groups, including the state's teachers union and civil rights groups such as the NAACP, first filed a lawsuit against the program six years ago.

The stakes of the highly anticipated ruling were evident by the nearly 2,000 parents and children who crowded the steps of the Capitol across from where justices were meeting. They were clad in bright red and yellow T-shirts that read, ''Warning!'' on the front and, ''200,000 Futures at Risk,'' on the back.

The battle inside the court was about whether the opportunity scholarship program violates restrictions on state support for religious institutions and a provision that requires the state to maintain a system of ``free public schools.''